OPEN INNOVATION MAPPING BASED ON PUBLISHER RESEARCH THROUGH BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Research on open innovation (OI) has increased in recent years, demonstrating its potential in various fields of knowledge. Its linkages with SMEs have attracted the attention of academics. This analysis was conducted from 2018 to 2022. This article aims to evaluate the intellectual structure of open innovation scientific studies, and their relation to various scientific fields, through bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database, publish or perish, the lens, and the VOSviewer software application. The methodology consists of a selective systematic and transparent process divided into four phases: (i) establishing search criteria for research fields, through literature review, (ii) database selection, (iii) application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to the selected documents and explanation of their uses software; and (iv) analysis of results through a scientific output performance approach and bibliometric mapping. The results show an increasing trend of open innovation publications quite a lot, especially in the United Kingdom and the United States, but only a few studies discussing open innovation in SMEs for researchers in Indonesia totaling 121 articles discussing marketing, economics, management and social sciences. So there are many opportunities for researchers in Indonesia. This study contributes to the field by providing an overview of open innovation in the context of MSMEs.
Â
Keywords: Open Innovation, Bibliometric, The Lens, VOSviewerFull Text:
PDFReferences
Anshari, M.; Almunawar, M. . (2021). Adopting open innovation for SMEs and industrial revolution 4.0. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag, 13, 405–427.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086
Ejiogu, A. R., & Ejiogu, C. (2018). Translation in the “contact zone†between accounting and human resource management: The nebulous idea of humans as assets and resources. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31(7), 1932–1956. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2986
Engelsberger, A., Halvorsen, B., Cavanagh, J., & Bartram, T. (2022). Human resources management and open innovation: the role of open innovation mindset. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(1), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12281
Galiulina, A., & Touate, S. (2022). the Role of Culture in Managing Open Innovation Projects Within Regional Clusters. European Project Management Journal, 12(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.56889/iaor2455
Grimsdottir, E., & Edvardsson, I. R. (2018). Knowledge Management, Knowledge Creation, and Open Innovation in Icelandic SMEs. SAGE Open, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018807320
Latifah, L., Setiawan, D., Aryani, Y. A., Sadalia, I., & Al Arif, M. N. R. (2022). Human Capital and Open Innovation: Do Social Media Networking and Knowledge Sharing Matter? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030116
Lo, C., Wang, C., & Chen, Y. C. (2020). The mediating role of intellectual capital in open innovation in the service industries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125220
Naqshbandi, M. M., & Tabche, I. (2018). The interplay of leadership, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning culture in open innovation: Testing a moderated mediation model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133(March), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017
Nobanee, H., Hamadi, F. Y. Al, Abdulaziz, F. A., Abukarsh, L. S., Alqahtani, A. F., Alsubaey, S. K., Alqahtani, S. M., & Almansoori, H. A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of sustainability and risk management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063277
Petrou, A. P., Hadjielias, E., Thanos, I. C., & Dimitratos, P. (2020). Strategic decision-making processes, international environmental munificence and the accelerated internationalization of SMEs. International Business Review, 29(5), 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101735
Pico-Saltos, R., Carrión-Mero, P., Montalván-Burbano, N., Garzás, J., & Redchuk, A. (2021). Research trends in career success: A bibliometric review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094625
Sabando-Vera, D., Yonfa-Medranda, M., Montalván-Burbano, N., Albors-Garrigos, J., & Parrales-Guerrero, K. (2022). Worldwide Research on Open Innovation in SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010020
Singh, S. K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. (2021). Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 128(April 2019), 788–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040
Sun, X., Li, H., & Ghosal, V. (2020). Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 59(February 2018), 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101388
Zhou, X., Rasool, S. F., Yang, J., & Asghar, M. Z. (2021). Exploring the relationship between despotic leadership and job satisfaction: The role of self efficacy and leader–member exchange. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105307
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31846/jae.v11i3.656
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
e-Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonnomi Indexed by:
     Â