MEASUREMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION SERVIVE QUALITY USING HEDPERF AND HIEDQUAL IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS METHODS
Abstract
The image of a tertiary institution is indicated by the quality of service perceived by students because the quality of service can also reflect the academic and non-academic quality of a tertiary institution. There have been many studies focusing on measuring the quality of services in higher education (using the Serqual measurement), therefore, this study aims to measure quality services by combining other approaches, namely HEdPERF and HiEDQUAL. Bung Hatta University was used as the research object (n=370 students). The university was selected because it is a reputable private university which was founded under the name one of the nation's proclamator with significant influence. Based on the results of data analysis using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) technique, it can be concluded that aspects of academic facilities and support services are in the quadrant that exceeds student expectations. On the other hand, the campus infrastructure aspect should be the main priority that must receive immediate attention, followed by the reputation, academic and program aspects which are quadrant positions that must be maintained while the administrative service aspect is in low priority position
Keywords: Service Quality, Higher Education, IPA (Importance-Performance Analysis), HedPERF, HiEDQUAL
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, F. (2006a). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
Abdullah, F. (2006b). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24, 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610641543
Ahmad, A., & Nikmah, U. (2017). Pengaruh Higher Education Performance (Hedperf) Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Universitas Sains Al Quran (Unsiq) Jawa Tengah Di Wonosobo. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ, 4(3), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.32699/ppkm.v4i3.429
Alma Buchari. (2013). Manajemen Pemasaran dan Pemasaran Jasa (13th ed.). Erlangga.
Amir, Taufiq. (2015). Merancang Kuesioner: Konsep dan Panduan untuk Penelitian Sikap, Kepribadian & Perilaku, Edisi I. Penerbit: Pranamedia Group, Jakarta
Dachlan, Usman. (2014). Panduan Lengkap Structural Equation Modeling Tingkat Dasar. Penerbit: Lentera Ilmu, Semarang
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1991). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39 -50
Annamdevula, & Raja Shekhar, B. (2016). Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty and motivation in Indian universities: Development of HiEduQual. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2014-0010%0A
Annamdevula, S. (2012). Development of HiEdQUAL for Measuring Service Quality in Indian Higher Education Sector. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijimt.2012.v3.265
Ardhyani, I. W., & Singgih, M. L. (2017). Pengukuran Kualitas Layanan dengan Higher Education Performance (Hedperf) dan Higher Education Service Quality (Hiedqual). Teknika: Engineering and Sains Journal, 1(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.51804/tesj.v1i1.65.25-32
Ariani, F., Sinaga, S., & Thamrin, T. (2017). Aplikasi Kepma untuk Mengukur Kepuasan Mahasiswa Menggunakan Metode Servqual Berbasis Android. EXPERT: Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.36448/jmsit.v7i1.873
Danjuma, I., Bawuro, F. A., Vassumu, M. A., & Habibu, S. A. (2018). The Service Quality Scale Debate: A Tri-Instrument Perspective for Higher Education Institutions. Expert Journal of Business and Management, 6(2), 127–133. http://business.expertjournals.com
Febriani, N. D., Fathoni, M. Z., & Ismiyah, E. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa XYZ Terhadap Program PERMATA-SAKTI Tahun 2020 dengan Metode HEdPERF dan HiEDQUAL. Jurnal Media Teknik Dan Sistem Industri, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.35194/jmtsi.v6i1.1457
Icli, G. E., & Anil, N. K. (2014). The HEDQUAL scale: A new measurement scale of service quality for MBA programs in higher education. South African Journal of Business Management, 45(3), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v45i3.129
Khalid, S. M., Ali, K. A. M., & Makhbul, Z. K. B. M. (2019). Assessing the effect of higher education service quality on job satisfaction among lecturers in premier polytechnics using hedperf model. Logforum, 15(3), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.356
Kotler, Philip and Kevin, Lane, K. (2013). Marketing Management (14th ed.). Pearson International edition.
Kurniati, E., & Kadarsih, K. (2017). Mengukur Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelayanan Baak Amik Akmi Baturaja. Jurnal Ilmiah Matrik, 0267, 237–246.
Mang’unyi, E. E., & Govender, K. K. (2017). International Review of Management and Marketing Using the Higher Education Performance Framework to Assess Service Quality and Satisfaction among Private University Students. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(3), 299–309. http:www.econjournals.com
Martono, S. (2021). Evaluasi Mutu Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi )Studi Pada Program Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana). Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 4(1), 28–51. http://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/jemap/article/view/2893/pdf
Oladipupo, O., Amoo, T., & Daramola, O. (2021). A Decision-Making Approach for Ranking Tertiary Institutions’ Service Quality Using Fuzzy MCDM and Extended HiEdQUAL Model. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4163906
Purwanto, Y., Prawono, W., & Kirana, R. W. (2022). Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan di Perguruan Tinggi Negeri dalam Perspektif Higher Educati 0 n Performance ( HEdPerf ) Menggunakan Important Performance Analysis ( IPA ). 15, 52–64.
Simbolon, R. W., Siallagan, S., Munte, E. D., & Barus, B. (2022). Pengukuran Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kualitas Pelaksanaan Proses Pembelajaran Menggunakan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (Studi Kasus : AMIK Medan Business Polytechnic). LOFIAN: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 1(2), 21–28. https://ejournal.umbp.ac.id/index.php/lofian/article/view/171
Sumarmi, W., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2016). Analisa Tingkat Kepuasan Kualitas Layanan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Berdasarkan Metode SERVQUAL. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Manajemen Industri, 2(1), 15–20.
Supranto, J., 1990. Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan: Untuk Menaikan Pangsa Pasar, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Tjahyadi, R. A., Lu, C., & Fionita, J. (2018). HIEDQUAL (High Education Quality) Dan Kepuasan Mahasiswa: Peran Reputasi Universitas Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(3), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.31843/jmbi.v5i3.170
Tjiptono, Fandy, A. (2016). Prinsi-prinsip Total Quality Service. Andi Offset.
Wati, L., Dharma, S., & Rosha, Z. (2018). Analysis of Student Satisfaction At X University, Using the Servqual Method. Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonomi, 6(3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.31846/jae.v6i3.88
Yusuf. (2017). The Influence of HEdPERF and Student Satisfaction Against Perceived Service Value and Implication In Institutional Image (Empiric Study on Students Regional Office of Universitas Terbuka at Pangkalpinang, Indonesia). Integrated Journal of Business and Economics, 1998, 5–16.
Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. and Li, W. 2005. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonalds ï·: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrica, 70(1): 1-11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31846/jae.v12i1.700
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
e-Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonnomi Indexed by:
 
 
     