FACTORS AFFECTING WILLINGNESS TO LENDFINTECH BASED ON PEER TO PEER LENDING WITH THE LEVEL OF PLATFORM TRUST AS AN INTERVENING VARIABLE
Abstract
Fintech P2P Lending was introduced in Indonesia in 2015 and along with technological advances, the P2P Lending industry experienced rapid development. This P2P Lending service connects lenders with borrowers to agree on lending and borrowing transactions. The aim of this research is to analyze the factors that influence the willingness to lend to fintech based on peer to peer lending with the level of trust in the platform as an intervening variable.The population from data collected from the Financial Services Authority Statistics is 158,366 bank accounts. Determining the sample using the Slovin technique, from the calculation results it was obtained that there were 99 rounded up to 100 samples who had been lenders from P2P lending platforms. The research results show that regulatory protection has a positive (0.265) and significant (0.001 < 0.05) effect on trust in the platform. Security guarant ees have a positive (0.584) and significant (0.000 < 0.05) effect on trust in the platform. Regulatory protection has a positive (0.203) and significant (0.030 < 0.05) effect on willingness to lend. Security guarantees have a positive (0.256) and significant (0.039< 0.05) effect on willingness to lend. Trust in the platform has a positive (0.388) and significant (0.004< 0.05) effect on willingness to lend. Regulatory protection has a significant effect (0.040< 0.05) on willingness to lend mediated by trust in the platform. Security guarantees have a significant effect (0.008< 0.05) on willingness to lend mediated by trust in the platform.
Keywords: Regulatory Protection, Security Guarantee, Platform Trust, Willingness To Lend
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ardelia, A., Dalimunthe, Z., & Triono, R. A. (2020). Exploring the critical factors affecting lender trust to invest in online peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. Innovation Management and Information Technology Impact on Global Economy in the Era of Pandemic, 37th(November 2017), 8–9. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3889859
Benuf, K., Mahmudah, S., & Priyono, E. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Data Konsumen Financial Technology Di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160
Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective. Information Technology and Management, 15(4), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z
Chen, S., Gu, Y., Liu, Q., & Tse, Y. (2020). How do lenders evaluate borrowers in peer-to-peer lending in China? International Review of Economics and Finance, 69(July), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.038
Chen, X., Hu, X., & Ben, S. (2021). How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms Evidence from China. Electronic Commerce Research, 21(4), 1055–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09400-9
Chinen, K., & Endo, H. (2018). Effects of Attitudes and Background on
Personal Financial Ability : A Survey in the United States Effects of Attitude and Background on Students ’ Personal Financial Ability : A United States Survey. March 2012.
Dorfleitner, G., Priberny, C., Schuster, S., Stoiber, J., Weber, M., de Castro, I., & Kammler, J. (2016). Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending–Evidence from two leading European platforms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 64, 169–187.
Fahmi, S. (2018). Pengaruh Persepsi Keamanan dan Kepercayaan terhadap Niat Konsumen dalam Melakukan Transaksi E-Commerce, melalui Sikap sebagai Variabel Intervening. JAMIN : Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Dan Inovasi Bisnis, 1(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.47201/jamin.v1i1.21
Gefen, D., & Anderson, P. A. P. (2004). The Moderating Role of Conflict on Feedback Mechanisms, Trust, and Risk in Electronic Marketplaces 1 RESEARCH NOTE The Moderating Role of Conflict on Feedback Mechanisms, Trust, and Risk in Electronic Marketplaces. 215(215), 740–7313. www.ebay.com
Gefen, D., & Pavlou, P. A. (2004). The Moderation Role of Conflict on Feedback Mechanisms, Trust, and Risk in Electronic Marketplaces. Research Note.
Hendershott, T., Zhang, X., Zhao, J. L., & Zheng, Z. (2021). FinTech as a game changer: Overview of research frontiers. Information Systems Research, 32(1), 1–17.
Hendri Rahmayani Asri, Ekaning Setyarini, & Hantoro Arief Gisijanto. (2022). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan, Persepsi Risiko, Dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Minat Penggunaan Peer To Lending. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(03), 01–09. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v1i03.99
Kovacs, L., & David, S. (2016). Fraud risk in electronic payment transactions. Journal of Money Laundering Control.
Li, Z. P., Ge, R. Y., Guo, X. S., & Cai, L. (2021). Can individual investors learn from experience in online P2P lending? Evidence from China. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58(July), 101524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101524
Lubis, A. N., Sadalia, I., Fachrudin, K. A., & Meliza, J. (2013). Perilaku investor keuangan.
Neysa, Y., Japarianto, E., Pemasaran, J. M., Petra, U. K., & Siwalankerto, J. (2014). Analisa Pengaruh Kepercayaan , Jaminan Rasa Aman , dan Aksesbilitas terhadap Minat Menabung Nasabah Bank Danamon di Surabaya. 2(1), 1–8.
Nurdin, A. R. (2018). Kajian Peraturan Perlindungan Konsumen Di Sektor Perbankan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(2), 299. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no2.1665
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor: 77 /POJK.01/2016 Tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 1–29. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/otoritas-jasa-keuangan/peraturan-ojk/Documents/Pages/POJK-Nomor-77-POJK.01-2016/SAL - POJK Fintech.pdf
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2018). Peraturan OJK No. 13/POJK.02/2018 Tentang Inovasi Digital di Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 1–29. http://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/regulasi/lembaga-keuangan-mikro/peraturan-ojk/Documents/SAL-POJK PERIZINAN FINAL F.pdf
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2022). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 /Pojk.05/2022 Tentang Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. 184, 1–27.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.
Putera, A. P. (2020). PRINSIP KEPERCAYAAN SEBAGAI FONDASI UTAMA KEGIATAN PERBANKAN. Commune, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum, 3.
Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&d dan Penelitian Pendidikan). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, 67.
Wang, P., Zheng, H., Chen, D., & Ding, L. (2015). Exploring the critical factors influencing online lending intentions. Financial Innovation, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-015-0010-9
Yahya, A. (2021). Sharia Fintech Development in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics Engineering and Social Science, InCEESS 2020, 17-18 July, Bekasi, Indonesia.
Yang, Y., Hsueh, H., Huang, M., Cho, T., & Kishi, Y. (2017). Effect of fintech on the productivity in the Taiwan banking industry. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 7(4), 255–263.
Zahroh, F. (2014). Menguji Tingkat Pengetahuan Keuangan, Sikap Keuangan Pribadi, dan Perilaku Keuangan Pribadi Mahasiswa Jurusan Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Semester 3 dan Semester 7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31846/jae.v12i3.745
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
e-Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonnomi Indexed by: