THE INFLUENCE OF EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT ON ENTREPRENEURIAL INTEREST, FAMILY SUPPORT AS A MODERATOR VARIABLE ( RESEARCH ON ECONOMICS STUDENT OF BUNG HATTA)

Purbo Jadmiko, Elfitra Azliyanti, Tyara Dwi Putri

Abstract


Quantitative research design was used to analyze the effect between variables of the study. Fukos research is to identify and analyse the role of perceived educational support, perceived family support against entrepreneur intention on Faculty of Economics University of Bung Hatta fields (100 respondents with the method purposive sampling) data analysis using the method of Partial Least Square to find out the role of variable pemoderasi. The results showed that the perceived educational support is not positive and significant effect against the entrepreneur intentio, whereas the role of perceived family support as a variable pemoderasi is also not supported. The discussion and research that will come under discussion on this research.
Key words: perceived educational support, perceived family support, entrepreneur intention

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Adhitama, P.P. 2014. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Berwirausaha (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis UNDIP, Semarang). Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi UNDIP, Semarang

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. 2011. Business Research Methods.11 ed. McGraw-Hill International Edition.

Davidsson, P. 1995. Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. Rent IX. Workshop, Piacenza, Italy.

Farzier & Niehm, 2008. An assessment of the entrepreneurial intentions of college students majoring in Family and Consumer Sciences.

Ghozali, Imam. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS).Semarang: Badan Penerbit UniversitasDiponegoro.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. 2010.Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014).A Primer on Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). CA: Sage.

Hisrich, D.R & Peter, P.M (2002). Entrepreneurship. 5th Edition. Edition Mcgraw-Hill College

Kram, E.K 1983. Phases of the mentor relationship. The Academy of Management JournalVol. 26, No. 4 (Dec., 1983), pp. 608-625

Kourilsky, M.L. & Walstad, W.B. (1998). Entrepre-neurship and Female Youth: Knowledge, Attitudes, Gender Differences and Educational Practices. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(1): 77-88

Rogoff G & Heck. R.K.Z (2003). Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5):559–566, 2003.

Shapero, A. and Sokol, L. (1982) The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C.Kent, D. Sexton and K. Vesper, (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of entrepreneurship, 72-90.

Suhartini, Y. 2001. “Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Mahasiswa dalam berwiraswasta (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Univer-sitas PGRI Yogyakarta).†Jurnal Akmenika UPY, Volume 7, tahun 2011, pp: 38-59.

Turker, D.and Selcuk,S. (2008) in Turkey , “Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?â€, in Turkey , Journal of European Industrial Training Vol. 33 No. 2, 2009 pp. 142-159, this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0590.htm

Zimmerer, W.T. 2002.Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management.Third Edition. New york: Prentice-Hall




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31846/jae.v6i3.89

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

e-Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonnomi Indexed by:

 

        Â